The Warband: Online Community

ningcom.png

ch-ichat-logo.pngWe’re going to try a new pilot program for an online community (through Ning.com) we’ve affectionately named, The Warband. It’s a little more involved than a simple blog, because you create a profile, add content and network with other fans. You can add pics, videos and post comments about music or books on the forum. It’s something we’re just trying out as a companion to my main site, so I’ll discontinue it if no one is interested. But I constantly hear how popular this sort of thing is, especially with the younger book-reading audience. Let me know what you think.

CH 

On Blogging: Ranters Beware

ch-ichat-logo.pngThe world of blogging is certainly an amazing realm, one in which the average Joe can leap onto the world’s stage and have a voice. Instantly. And free. Newbies form a clever name, add a picture header and an avatar when leaving posts on other people’s blogs. Networks are made on the basis of shared opinions and similar interests. And soon the writer is flung into the fray, finding a voice that can be read from any desktop, laptop or PDA in the world (save for maybe those nations that are still bound by Communistic censorship).

With the advent of personal websites, their popularity growing in the late 90′s, many people began to realize that static hubs on the internet would soon fade, never disappearing, but certainly not the draw they used to be. Soon after, profile based online communities began to sprout up, and people began “connecting”: while I’m an avid fan of developing technologies, the fact that people think they have legitimate, lasting “friends” via a finger smudged screen is a tragic reality worthy of genuine pity. No wonder they call us the “Screen Generation.”

Regardless, the new found vehicle to divulge one’s thoughts online was born. Adventurers used it to log their travels while statisticians used it follow trends. Those in marketing formed clever cliques to exchange ideas while authors co-wrote ongoing group novels. And the general public grabbed hold of the concept to talk, chat, or simply to convey what they were feeling. To log their thoughts. To journal. Even to share the secrets of their hearts.

The same problem I was afraid of initially with online writing is the same problem I see maturing into a larger problem today.

I still remember the first time I read someone’s blog where they said something that made me blush. Not because it was to me, or even about me. But because it was something I felt, in my opinion, shouldn’t have been disclosed in a public forum. It was personal. Beyond embarrassment for them, however, I wondered as to why they would ever divulge such sensitive information on, of all places, the internet. The answer, I believe, is simple.

Anonymity has no accountability.

Now in 2008, I think a majority of people understand that anything posted online is subject to a billion set of eyes. For some, they just don’t care; for others, they should care. Regardless of their personal feelings, the fact remains that sharing thoughts via a screen, and not face-to-face, removes one of the fundamental human safe guards: Personal accountability and consequence.

You could say that the realm of internet blogging lets mankind get away with expressing views we could never get away with in person. Some would argue that this is a perfect example of what freedoms technology has afforded us; even the Apostle Paul himself noted the difference between his bold writings and his more meek appearance when in person. And while I certainly would agree that we should utilize the forward progress of technology to advance thinking and shared, proactive development, I will always maintain that such pushes must be accompanied by the same values we would institute on any other form of human contact.

Particularly in the area of Christian blogging, I have noticed, and am myself guilty of, a trend which I wish to help curb, at least as far as I have the power. And that is of ranting without edification.

While I have been delighted to see the Christian voice step forward, addressing everything from political and moral debates to spiritual and theological issues, I have noticed a strong, and I mean strong leaning to the pessimistic, cynical and accusatory. And here’s the real rub: While some of what they are addressing is accurate, and even note worthy, there is a lack of the uplifting, especially when directed at other Christians or the Body of Christ in general.

Please do not misunderstand me. I refuse for any reader who’s made it this far to say, “So you expect us to make light of every situation all the time?” Hardly. But we have a requirement to be Christlike in not only our assessment, but our conclusions for actions, which is another element lost.

Anyone can criticize. We know that. But to give a specific suggestion, even a lousy one, is at least something. I heard Sylvester Stallone interviewed this week about his new Rambo film. He had an interesting comment when asked what he thought about all the negative reviews. (And I’m paraphrasing): “I don’t care if they give me one star. But at least tell me what you’d change. Give some advice to balance out your commentary.”

Face-to-face conversation brings with it a built in consequence policy. It always has and it always will–unless we raise an entire generation of pansies. If I go off on some rant face-to-face, I have surrounded myself with people that will pop me in the arm (or the head) for un-Christlike attitudes, behavior and conduct–my 5’1″ Irish-Dutch wife chief among them. And while we could certainly write comments in response to posts, making the author aware of our disagreement, the written word has far less impact than the spoken word (why God left us the written scriptures but would much rather have a personal relationship). This is namely because, in person, we’re instantly prone to observation and challenge from another tangible human being as opposed to a distant representation of someone on the other side.

I would like to make myself accountable to those of you who read my work, whether you’re just surfing by or whether you have an RSS feed to my site and by my books and music. If I ever critique, point a finger at, or drill a person, issue or doctrine without so much as a constructive remedy that edifies the Body of Christ as a whole, call me on it. I humbly welcome it. And I would encourage you to do the same. Anyone of us can point out where the Church is blowing it, where “the system” is falling apart. Anyone of us can say we have to “do better.” But one thing I believe about Jesus from scripture was that he had a constant attitude of encouragement, and when rebuke came, it was always followed by reconciliation (thus the Biblical word “reprove”). And he was specific.

If I disciplined my children, only telling them what they “generally” did wrong and never what I desired their behavior to look like, devoid of specific examples which I could emulate as their father, I would be guilty of torture (“Fathers, do not exasperate your children”). Instead, every time I chastise them (since we’re using old words today), it comes in great detail, care and concern. It’s almost methodical, every action I take with them carrying some specific purpose designed for their ultimate success.

May we be delivered of the endless rant, left open-ended because we never were thoughtful enough to close it with a resolution of action. Talk is cheap, and talk without actions is cheaper.

So, why such a deep rooted rant of my own today? If there is any merit to what I’m saying, then let’s save the strongest point for last. I’m slowly learning about a spiritual truth often overlooked by my own understanding: There is only one accuser of the brethren, and his name is Satan. You are either in his camp or you’re not. Satan never gives suggestions on how to be more like Christ, he only points out how you’re not.

In closing, and in response to my own words, I’d like to offer my checklist for responsible blogging. Feel free to add to it as you feel led.

1.) Rant, But With A Pre-Determined Purpose. If you find yourself needing a soap box, by all means, go for it. No one’s denying you that. But make sure that from the outset you have a defined purpose. Defining a purpose for each post will help save you from the roaming deserts of ranting, and will keep your emotions from sidetracking you from what could have been a very thoughtful and helpful entry. Write the purpose down even before you click on “write post.” What do you want your post to accomplish and provoke? Is it for your readers to be better Christ-followers? Is it scriptural? Does it fit with the nature of Christ? When you’re done writing your heart out, review your intention and see if your post finishes along those lines. If not, it should be re-worked.

2.) Don’t Slam, Suggest. As I stated before, it’s easy for us to slam the system: “What’s wrong with the American Church.” But guess what, the Church in Vietnam has problems as does the Church in India and the Church in Holland. We got it. Move past taking pot-shots at God’s Bride, no matter how deserving you may think it is, and suggest real points of action that you are willing to start or are already engaged in. In doing this you’ll prompt your readers further into righteous action, which should be our goal anyway, not condemn them for what they’re already not doing.

3.) Encourage. As Christians we are called to exhort, an old word meaning to edify and build up. And not only that, but Christ said we’d be known as His disciples by one chief characteristic: Our love for one another. If ever we’ve been given a tool to construct and prompt and promote Godly works, it’s the blog! Yes, we all need correction. I’m not sure about you, but I get it, along with attack from the enemy, on every front all the time. And in comparison with the amount of encouragement I receive, it’s far more. Likewise, see your blog as a tool to uplift; people probably need it as much as I do.

4.) Be Specific. Working in vague generalities is normally redundant and non-progressive. Plus, it usually betrays the fact that the writer has done little to no research into the very area they’re trying to so expertly write about. When posting, be as specific as possible to things you’ve witnessed or experienced first hand. Stay away from things you’re not familiar with. And, when suggesting alternatives, beware of broad sweeps like, “Make the movie better,” and try, “The development of the character in the second half of the movie could have been more successful if you spent more time on showing his childhood memories.” It’s the specific means and methods, even the driving principles that have shaped my views on life, not the oversimplified comments of a powerless, self-indulgent few.

May we as Christians continue to surge ahead as the example of what love truly is, and even how it reads on the internet.

CH

Everything Has Changed

deep-rock-drive.png

Without going into a long, drawn out dissertation on the internet revolution and how it has quite literally revolutionized the world (on par with the microwave oven), I did want to jump on the demise-of-the-record-industry band wagon for just a moment and introduce a radical new concept. (Yes, one I wish I had come up with).

As most of you probably know, the record industry in the US is and has been in a state of upheaval for the last few years (to put it mildly). While most people talk about generalities, the specifics are quite simple. Artists are no longer in need of two primary components, both of which were previously secured by large, well-networked, well-oiled machines called “record companies” (currently shaking in their boots); my daughter and son’s generation may even view the term like I view fax machines.

1.) The advent of digital recording, growing better and better everyday, has brought the previously outrageously expensive tools right into a teenager’s dirty bedroom. (While there is still a huge discussion about a teenager actually knowing how to use them in such an environment, and also an endless discussion about the true artists we still call “recording engineers,” I’ll save both for another day).

2.) It no longer requires a massive marketing budget to promote an artist to stardom. Which, in turn, has accomplished another interesting side-effect: if you’re going to succeed, you actually need to be good because grass roots marketing doesn’t accept plastic.

The pioneers of the next age of the music business will be those who are constantly looking for ways to use technology to their advantage, pushing the limits and being as creative with it as they are with their art. If there was ever a door for the right and left brained musician entrepreneur to step forward, it’s today.

Allow me to introduce to you DeepRockDrive.com. As a client of SweetWater Sound, a marvelous, complete package audio sales firm, I receive their newsletter. Last month’s periodical introduced a new concept they are backing, one which rocked me to my core. Pun definitely intended. Allow me to explain…

No name band likes playing together.

No name band starts gigging locally and building a fan base to alleviate no name status.

No name band finds out about deeprockdrive.com and puts their nameless band up for a vote.

No name band tells all their friends on MySPace, Facebook and at each gig to go vote for them.

After 1,000 votes, no name band goes out to Nevada and performs live on a private stage with state-of-the-art streaming video and audio uploads worldwide. Viewers change camera angles and text song suggestions.

No name band still doesn’t have a name, but they are well on their way to a much larger fan base.

If you’re as sick of reading “no name” as I am of typing it, then save yourself some trauma and check out this very creative venture (introduction video below). And who knows…you may even see my bald head there one day!

CH

CSFF: Winners!

 jo-header.png

ch-ichat-logo.pngI’d like to thank all the CSFF Blog Tour participants, Becky Miller, and all those that dropped by my site over the last three days, whether saying “hi” or entering the contest.

A special congratulations to the top three finishers of the Jeffrey Overstreet Culture Hunt Contest:

ForstRose: 350 points 

Roheryn: 245 points

Jason Clement: 40 points

Roh and FR really sprinted to the finis neck and neck. And if Roh had published her additional 9 comments (worth 25 points each) just 49 minutes sooner (as she went into the next day), she would have taken first place.

All three finishers will receive an autographed CD of their choice from either my or my wife’s record collections, as well as a special edition issue poster for the back of their closet door or cubical space, sure to get lots of laughs (or at least a lot of pity).

Thanks again to everyone that makes the CSFF Blog Tour such a success each month, and for supporting Jeffrey Overstreet.

Blessings!

CH 

CSFF: Final Day of Overstreet Contest!

jo-pic.pngch-ichat-logo.pngSo here we are, the final 24 hours for you to conclude (or just get going) on our three-day culture hunt highlighting Jeffrey Overstreet. (We even had Jeffrey himself stop by to leave a comment! Very cool!). Please read the previous two posts to catch up as you can still place! In fact, given the point strucrture of this final hunt, and the possibility to rack up a lot of them, you could still be extremely competitive–even take first place!

The Day’s Hunt is:

Jeffrey Likes To Blog

We all are aware by now that the blog (or “web log”) is a very potent and effective way of communicating and network building. But I want to take an active approach in the process and give you a chance to earn some more points.

1.) First, you’ll need to go and visit Jeffrey’s blog here and leave a thoughtful comment on any of his latest posts (meaning post up within the past two weeks).

2.) Next, you need to choose 5 blogs from the list below and post comments on their blogs regarding Jeffrey’s work (or pertaining to something they’ve posted on Jeffrey), including a link to his website. The blog doesn’t even need to have posted about Jeffrey or his books specifically; all you need to do is post a comment relating to their topic and SOMEHOW weave Jeffrey into it. (Be creative!).

3.) Report back here in comment-form on this post with the six links (Jeffrey’s plus the five others).

jo-book.pngI’ll give the first two finishers 100 points and 50 points to the following four finishers with 25 points to all those remaining who enter.

***As a bonus, I’ll give you an additional 25 points for each additional blog that you post a comment on (providing that you include the link on your post back here.***

Remember, there are numerous free prizes on the line here (I’ve even asked Jeffrey if he’d throw something in the pot, but I’m still waiting to hear back from him).

Happy blog hunting!

CH

Here’s your list of blogs to post on!:

Brandon Barr Jim Black Justin Boyer Grace Bridges Jackie Castle Carol Bruce Collett Valerie Comer CSFF Blog Tour D. G. D. Davidson Chris Deanne Jeff Draper April Erwin Marcus Goodyear Andrea Graham Jill Hart Katie Hart Timothy Hicks Heather R. Hunt Becca Johnson Jason Joyner Kait Karen Carol Keen Mike Lynch Margaret Rachel Marks Shannon McNear Melissa Meeks Rebecca LuElla Miller Mirtika or Mir’s Here Pamela Morrisson Eve Nielsen John W. Otte John Ottinger Deena Peterson Rachelle Steve Rice Cheryl Russel Ashley Rutherford Hanna Sandvig Chawna Schroeder James Somers Rachelle Sperling Donna Swanson Steve Trower Speculative Faith Jason Waguespac Laura Williams Timothy Wise

CSFF: Day 2 Culture Hunt for Jeffrey Overstreet

jo-field.png

jo-book.png

For those just joining us, we have a little contest going in the hopes of drumming up newfound support for the writings and blog of Jeffrey Overstreet. It’s not too late to join in the fun, but to be the least bit competitive you’ll need to check out yesterday’s post and follow the instructions; you’ll at least get the 10 points for participating.

The Day’s Hunt is:

Jeff Likes To Write

Jeff not only has written for some notable publications around the country (including Paste, Risen, Image, Relevant, Books & Culture, and SPU’s Response), but he’s also a novelist. Through a Screen Darkly, a memoir and travelogue of “dangerous moviegoing, and Auralia’s Colors, the first volume in a four-book fantasy series called The Auralia Thread, were both published in 2007.

Your mission is to:

1.) Find an online store that sells his books and post a comment.

2.) Come back here and paste the same comment with the link to the page of the original comment on this post.

through-a-screen-darkly.pngNow, if you are unfamiliar with his works, then you obviously can’t review them. But you can at least say, in a positive light, that you’ve heard about him and (if true) you are interested in reading his books or following his blog, etc.

To the first three people that complete this task, I’ll ward 40, 30 and 20 points respectively, with 10 points to anyone else that completes the task.

***I’ll also award 75 points to anyone that purchases his book today!*** (I’ll contact you from your comment information and request an emailed copy of your receipt).

Happy hunting!

CH

PS – Check out what all these other great bloggers are saying about Jeffrey!:

Brandon Barr Jim Black Justin Boyer Grace Bridges Jackie Castle Carol Bruce Collett Valerie Comer CSFF Blog Tour D. G. D. Davidson Chris Deanne Jeff Draper April Erwin Marcus Goodyear Andrea Graham Jill Hart Katie Hart Timothy Hicks Heather R. Hunt Becca Johnson Jason Joyner Kait Karen Carol Keen Mike Lynch Margaret Rachel Marks Shannon McNear Melissa Meeks Rebecca LuElla Miller Mirtika or Mir’s Here Pamela Morrisson Eve Nielsen John W. Otte John Ottinger Deena Peterson Rachelle Steve Rice Cheryl Russel Ashley Rutherford Hanna Sandvig Chawna Schroeder James Somers Rachelle Sperling Donna Swanson Steve Trower Speculative Faith Jason Waguespac Laura Williams Timothy Wise

CSFF Blog Tour: 3-Day Culture Hunt Contest!

jo-header.png

jo-pic.pngch-ichat-logo.pngYou may or may not have heard about Jeffrey Overstreet. If you have, you’ll be familiar with his numerous injections into modern Christian and secular culture. If you haven’t, then this is the perfect moment to begin. For I think anyone needing inspiration, especially when dialogging about the day in which we live, and the arts and theology (or lack thereof) that move us, would be greatly encouraged to make this connection.

As you know from the title prefix of this post, it’s time for three days of blogging on this month’s Christian Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog Tour. Fun times! But what’s new is that I’ve decided to run a little contest to help promote Jeffrey and his work, for whatever it’s worth.

jo-book.pngBookmarking his blog is certainly something I’d recommend (as would be reading his books, which we’ll talk about later). The way he manages his site is right up my alley personally, not to mention his love and views on the arts (go u2!). But anyone can ask you to do that in order to create a buzz. I’d like to try something a little more involved. So, here’s the game…

Starting today, and ending Wednesday at midnight, I’m going to be asking you, my faithful readers, to start digging. Each morning I’ll post rules for “The Day’s Hunt,” and you must respond in kind by midnight that night. Some of the challenges will be simple, others will be more complex and time consuming, all requiring a little ingenuity (all you at CFS have an intuitive “search engine mentality” head-start). But to the winners go the spoils.

To the First, Second and Third Place winners I’ll award a free autographed CD of either my or my wife’s collections (pending what we have in stock), as well as an autographed poster that I’ll be making personally for this contest (truly wacky, one-of-a-kind). (I’m not assuming anyone actually wants a poster of me hanging in their cubicle, but the incentive here is that it won’t be a “normal” author/musician poster; I promise your friends will be laughing and won’t believe it’s who you say it is).

<…making himself nervous as he writes…>

If I have enough feedback from this contest, I may throw in some others stuff, and even include those who don’t place in the top three.

So, here’s The Day’s Hunt for Monday, January 21st 2008:

Jeff Likes Movies

Jeffrey Overstreet loves to review movies. I want you to find an online review that he’s written and:

1.) If you are able, leave a comment on the review itself.

2.) Write a comment on my post right here on my site, agreeing or disagreeing with his analysis (and why).

3.) Paste a link to his movie review at the end of your comment.

I’ll award 40 points to the first contestant to complete these steps, 30 points to the second, 20 points to the third and 10 points to anyone else that competes at all.

***I’ll also give the first person who can tell me Jeffrey’s favorite movie 50 bonus points.*** (posted in a comment on my site)

Happy hunting!

CH

PS – Make sure to check out all these other blogs to see what people are writing!:

Brandon Barr Jim Black Justin Boyer Grace Bridges Jackie Castle Carol Bruce Collett Valerie Comer CSFF Blog Tour D. G. D. Davidson Chris Deanne Jeff Draper April Erwin Marcus Goodyear Andrea Graham Jill Hart Katie Hart Timothy Hicks Heather R. Hunt Becca Johnson Jason Joyner Kait Karen Carol Keen Mike Lynch Margaret Rachel Marks Shannon McNear Melissa Meeks Rebecca LuElla Miller Mirtika or Mir’s Here Pamela Morrisson Eve Nielsen John W. Otte John Ottinger Deena Peterson Rachelle Steve Rice Cheryl Russel Ashley Rutherford Hanna Sandvig Chawna Schroeder James Somers Rachelle Sperling Donna Swanson Steve Trower Speculative Faith Jason Waguespac Laura Williams Timothy Wise

Sinful Audio?

ch-ichat-logo.pngFor those that are astute Christians, and even those that aren’t, the presence of sin in the context of music, no mater your flavor, both lyrically and in the industry, is common knowledge. To many it is an understood truth, a fact of the day in which we live. To others it is the subject of study and constant analysis, helping others to know what to avoid and what’s “acceptable.” We have Christian pundits, reviewers and watchdogs that alert the religious leaning public to new releases that are heretical and sometimes scandalous. We have email lists and magazines, blogs, flogs and news servers all dedicated to the preservation of purity in the every growing artistic expression of music. The bottom line is clear, however, no mater your personal preferences or stomach (or lack thereof) for morality and all its perversions: sin has been in the music business for a long time.

But in audio?

Any brief study of music history will turn up some fascinating results, the most striking of which being that our culture’s speedy and self-indulging propensities have not only influenced our lust for 60-second meals and instant product downloads, but also a shortening of our attention span. I’m not the first to point out that our mind’s tolerance and enjoyment for 30-minute pieces of music (Bach) have been replaced with 3-minute pieces of–errr–”music” by [insert band name here]. But what if our face paced, hedonistic culture produced something we didn’t expect: a degradation in sound quality.

Sure, I know what you’re thinking. “Duh, MP3′s are a compressed format.” But so are CD’s. Any avid collector of vinyl will tell you there’s absolutely no comparison when it comes to real sign waves (just ask our Associate Pastor, Christian Fahey). The industry standard, commonly referred to as “The Oven,” is still a Studer 24-track, 2″ tape machine (sadly becoming a dinosaur).

But that’s not what I’m talking about. What if the very way that producers mixed was changing? What if the way we’re processing sound is detrimental to the human brain, responsible for “fatigue” all in the name of “getting your attention”? It’s my belief that the influence of sin in music does not just stop with the raunchy music videos or graphic lyrical content. It’s now affected how we make music in the recording and reproducing process. For the true artists, it’s much worse. It would be like exchanging a painter’s brush with a Q-Tip and asking him to create a fine work of art. Maybe. Perhaps. But why give him a $.05 ear cleaning utensil when he could have had his $56.00 fine-haired brush?

Because it’s not really about beauty anymore. It’s largely about money. A Q-Tip is easier to mass produce. So is a mixing style that does not allow for real music to be heard anymore.

For further reading, I encourage you to check out this article entitled The Death of High Fidelity by Robert Levine. You’ll get the technical read there, but I thought I’d provide you with the spiritual one first.

The fact is, it’s we the consumers who are advocating the pursuit of lesser means of production. We keep buying what they keep producing. And there’s no condemnation here; the average listener has no idea what they’re hearing. But, like anything else, from what that hard-core singer is really saying to what all those little acronyms actually mean on a teenager’s MySpace, we need to be educated. So consider this your first lesson on “the art of mixing” if you haven’t been aware before.

Here’s to a new generation producing music that’s beautiful again. A special salute to my father, Peter Hopper, as well as to Gary Hedden of GHL Audio, who have continued strive for true beauty in their trade, resistant to the trends of pop-culture. Let the verses be soft and the choruses be loud! (And death to over compression!)

Thanks for spending some time with me today.

CH

This Flog Is Moving Along

ch-ichat-logo.pngNo. I was not trying to leave that last post up just to bleed out every single comment I could. But it sure was nice to see a whopping 36 comments! I really appreciate everyone’s encouragement. And more than one or two good ideas were shared, including an official declaration I’m going to pronounce on my site:

“From now on, this website will be known as a cross between a blog (traditionally a web-based journal) and a forum (a place for people to interact by leaving comments), now entitled a FLOG. I’ll supply the journal-styled post of news, opinion or topic, you supply the comments and spur the conversation forward.”

While a flogging is typically thought of as a painful things (thank you, Nathan), I hope this to be far less so. With any luck, we maybe be able to share and converse on any number of issues. I welcome your input and appreciate anything you have to contribute in advance. Please include any questions you may have or suggestions for future posts, upcoming tid-bits on anything related to Christendom, the arts or politics.

cover-relevant-podcats.pngToday I wanted to pass along a cool podcast put out by Relevant Magazine. The Relevant Podcast (click HERE to subscribe through iTunes) is chock full of interesting perspectives, new music and stuff I categorize under “just plain fun.” For those of you that are able to listen to commentary during your work day, blast it in your office (or in your head phones); for those that need driving material, stick it on your iPod or burn it on CD. But either way, I think you’ll enjoy it. And let me know! Many of you already subscribe to it (and mad thanks to both John Brennan and Jason Clement for turning me on to it).

Have a great weekend!

CH

Please, Leave Bloggers Your Comments.

In the past few days I’ve had a reoccurring discussion with some of my friends, and not of my own volition (…the conversation…not my friends). It has gone something like this:

“Hey, Christopher, I love your site and keep up with all you’re doing. Love the last post especially,” ya-da, ya-da, ya-da… “I know I should probably leave a comment or something, but I don’t.”

If it wasn’t for the statistic program that I run on my site, and those type of phone calls and emails from friends, I probably wouldn’t bother writing posts for my site at all. I would equate it to, quite frankly, spending way too much time writing empty posts read by no one that then disapear into cyber-space forever. And ever. I reason that putting up new material on a site (something inherently great about the blogging concept) keeps people coming back, as opposed to the more “classic” idea of a static website that just posts “new dates” or ” new pics” and really gives people no reason to return.

The fact is, most people who keep up their blogs on a regular basis eagerly wait for other people to write them back. Seriously. Maybe it’s that we need the positive reinforcement of “being heard.” Maybe we’re cave-dwelling recluses who crave outside interaction. Or maybe we’re just tired of tagging 90% of the comments on our sites as SPAM and crave just one single, simple, singular line of text not created by an automated robot designed to leave illicit adds.

All it takes is a “Hey, great post.” Or, “That was a waste of my time, but I love you.” But knowing that people actually are reading your posts, now matter how tivial, gives you the juice to keep going.

Sure, sure, we write because we can. And we write “even if no one is reading.”

…yeah. Right.

What would be the point of that? Keep a personal journal, for the love of Abraham!

No, we write to stay in touch with people, to express our ideas, to let our stinky armpits (ie. opinions) be heard. And maybe, just maybe, someone is reading who says, “Wow, that really meant a lot to me.”

Of course, to say that, we bloggers might actually need to write something inspiring and worth your time. But that’s a different post.

To all my faithful readers who do shout out on this site, you guys rock! Thank you! I read and approve each one of your comments myself (one of the only web-things I make sure I personally moderate).

So, do your favorite bloggers a favor. Go ahead. Leave a little comment. One line. Take 30 seconds and just let them know you’re out there. Reading. Caring about what they have to say. I can guarantee you it will make their day.

(How pitiful, right?).

CH

2008 Starts With Snow And 3,000+ Words

Happy New Year my friends! I hope this post finds you well, prospering in the blessings of the Father.

Jennifer and I rang in the new year at The Lyric in Clayton, NY as part of the DIBOR Masquerade Ball. Complete with dancing, karaoke, skit-in-a-bag, live music and of course, great coffee, we enjoyed a joyous time with our friends (and not too few toothpicks of cheese, meat and garlic bread!). A brief stop to a few other parties and we were home by 2:00am to relieve our babysitters.

For those that know me, 10:00pm is my normal bedtime. Needless to say I don’t do too well with anything past midnight, let alone 2:00am! But there must have been some grace upon me as I never once got sleepy. That grace, however, departed this morning.  To quote E.T., “Ouuuuuch.”

When I arose, more to keep my children from ravaging the house than for my own desire to wake, a gentle snow was falling. Apparently it had been all night as there was a fresh six inches on the ground. And it kept falling…and falling…and falling…

As of 6:03pm ET, it’s still falling. Winter has officially arrived in northern NY. (Actually it arrived November 20th, but this sounds better).  Jennifer and I dawned our evening wear from last night’s Ball and took some pictures in the falling snow. It was her idea and I gladly played along. All during the kid’s nap time, of course! I’ll post some of those picks later this week perhaps.

I also decided that I would spend a few hours on this first day of 2008 doing what I didn’t do for nearly all of 2007: writing. I knocked out a whole chapter (#15) and 3,450 words. Talk about feeling good! Of course my fear is that I won’t get a day like that again in quite some time. But with any help from my wife and all of you, I’m hoping today was my return to my elusive “writing groove.”

May 2008 mark the best memories of your life, and our greatest demonstration of love and service to our King to date.

Thanks for spending some time with me today,

CH